Legal Opinion

Seymour v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 2011No. A11A0894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Charles Thomas Seymour guilty of arson. Following the denial of his amended motion for new trial, Seymour appeals, asserting several claims of error, including a claim that the trial court erred in denying him the right to represent himself. Because the trial court employed the wrong standard for determining whether Seymour knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel, we reverse this case for a new trial.

Construed in favor of the verdict, the record reveals that Seymour spent the night at his parent’s home. Around 11:00 p.m., Seymour’s father…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lamar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Mock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bettis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Donte Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  3. Roger Bettis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API