Legal Opinion
Hovendick v. Ruby
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 2000No. 99-197Published
1Opinion of the Court
10 P.3d 1119 (2000)
Stanley HOVENDICK and Lillian Hovendick, husband and wife, Appellants (Defendants),
v.
Willis RUBY, Appellee (Plaintiff).
No. 99-197.
Supreme Court of Wyoming.
August 22, 2000.
Representing Appellant: Robert A. Nicholas, Riverton, Wyoming.
Representing Appellee: Richard D. Gist, Lander, Wyoming.
Before LEHMAN, C.J., and THOMAS, MACY,[*] GOLDEN, and HILL, JJ.
GOLDEN, Justice.
The trial court granted summary judgment to Appellee Willis Ruby (Ruby) on his adverse possession claim of an 18.94 acre parcel to which Appellants Stanley and Lillian Hovendick (Hovendicks) hold the legal title…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- England v. SimmonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- French v. PearceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.