Legal Opinion

Glisson v. McGehee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1909No. 1968Published

Complaint; from city court of Americus — Judge Crisp. May 8, 1909.

1Opinion of the Court

Hni, O. J.

1. There was no usury in the note sued on, under the facts and the law as construed by the Supreme Court in Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co., 79 Ga. 213 (7 S. E. 265), Sanders v. Nicolson, 101 Ga. 739 (28 S. E. 976), Gannon v. Scottish American Mortgage Co., 106 Ga. 510 (32 S. E. 591), and McCall v. Herring, 118 Ga. 522 ( 45 S. E. 422).

2. The charge of the court fully and correctly instructed the jury on the question of usury, and the exceptions to portions of the charge on that subject are without merit, when considered' with the entire charge.

3 No material error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merck v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Sanders v. NicolsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. McCall v. HerrinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Gannon v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API