Legal Opinion

Barefoot v. . Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 28, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Lyon, J., at October Term, 1913, of CUMBERLAND.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. Ctjeiam.

This action was brought to recover $172.54, double the amount of excessive and unlawful interest alleged to have been paid to defendant, as usury, upon an indebtedness of the former to the latter, evidenced by a note and mortgage to secure the same. The note was given for $1,528.25, whereas plaintiffs allege that he received on the loan only $1,223.48. The transaction was conducted through W. A. Stewart as attorney for the plaintiff. He received the $1,528.25 from defendant, paid off a debt due by plaintiff to J. C. Layton amounting to $1,223.48, and it did not appear what…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Patapsco Guano Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Jeffress v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Phifer v. Commissioners of Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Roberts v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Ritter Lumber Co. v. MoffittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Faulkner Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, William P. Johnson and Hollis B. Johnson, Doing Business as Radio Carrollton, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Doss Ex Rel. Doss v. SewellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Powell v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API