Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ellis v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1964No. Appeals, 190 and 191Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

It is clear that upon the death of Abraham M. Ellis on September 1, 1961, the partnerships which existed between him and his three sons (each partner having a 25% interest) were dissolved. Paragraph eleven of each of the complaints recognizes the termination of the partnerships by reason of the death of the co-partner. Dissolution of a partnership by death of a co-partner is the undisputed mandate of Section 31 of the Uniform Partnership Act, March 26, 1915, P. L. 18, 59 P.S. §93(4), which states: “Dissolution is caused *423... by the death of any partner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Spivak v. BronsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Lee v. DahlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API