Legal Opinion

Howarth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 24, 1996No. 95-2669PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

673 So.2d 580 (1996)

Michael Edward HOWARTH, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-2669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 24, 1996.

Michael Edward Howarth, Raiford, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

ANTOON, Judge.

Michael E. Howarth appeals the trial court's summary denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We affirm.

In 1987, Mr. Howarth entered pleas of guilty to charges of forgery, uttering a forgery, and dealing in stolen property. When he was later…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Bannister v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. McArthur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Duenas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Howarth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API