Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 31, 2002No. 3:19-cv-00001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS

TINDER, District Judge.

The grand jury charged Defendant Michael Brown in a two-count Indictment. The prosecution is based on the statutory scheme that is the centerpiece of federal firearms regulation, the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 921-930, and both charges arise from a 1996 amendment (the “Lautenberg Amendment”) to that statutory scheme. The Lautenberg Amendment added domestic violence misdemeanants to the list of persons who -are prohibited from possessing or receiving firearms which have an interstate commerce nexus. Count One of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. United States v. HolbrookDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API