United States v. Brown
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS
TINDER, District Judge.
The grand jury charged Defendant Michael Brown in a two-count Indictment. The prosecution is based on the statutory scheme that is the centerpiece of federal firearms regulation, the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 921-930, and both charges arise from a 1996 amendment (the “Lautenberg Amendment”) to that statutory scheme. The Lautenberg Amendment added domestic violence misdemeanants to the list of persons who -are prohibited from possessing or receiving firearms which have an interstate commerce nexus. Count One of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snyder v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. HolbrookDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009