Legal Opinion

Northwestern National Bank & Trust Co. v. Pirich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1943No. 33,492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngdahl, Justice.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court, entered pursuant to an order, construing certain inconsistent and ambiguous provisions found in the last will and testament of Albert Schultz, wherein a testamentary trust was created for the benefit of his surviving heirs at law.

*314The facts giving rise to this appeal, insofar as here material, are substantially these: The settlor, Albert Schultz, died on May 5, 1929, leaving as his sole surviving heirs at law his wife, Frances Schultz, and his daughter, Stella Welch. Subsequent to his death his widow married George…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. First and American National Bank v. HigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Roberts v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cannon v. BarryMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
  4. In re the Trusteeship under the Last Will & Testament of BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. University v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. BarnhartIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. United States v. Curtis C. Goodson, of the Estate of Louis W. Hill, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Smith v. Bank of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. In Re Trust Under Will of SchultzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API