Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 13, 1801PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Upon a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Scott county.

1Opinion of the Court

The only part of the slanderous words laid in the declaration in this suit, which can be thought actionable, is as follows, to-wit: “You are an insurgent; you have opposed and insulted the excise officer, and have encouraged others to' do so, and you have, whilst an assembly man, threatened to raise men to help the Fort Pitt insurgents against the state’s army by force of arms;” and it seems clear that the speaker meant to explain the first clause of this charge by those which follow it. But to oppose and insult an excise officer, and encourage others to do so, does not necessarily mean more…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Temple v. FergusonTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Yates v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brown v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1875
  4. Snoddy v. KreutchTennessee Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Snoddy v. KreutchTennessee Supreme Court · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API