State v. Griffie
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
In his application for reopening, appellant argued that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective for not requesting an instruction on the lesser included offense of assault. However, appellant offers no support for his argument besides the record. App.R. 26(B)(2)(e) states that an application for reopening shall contain “[a]ny parts of the record available to the applicant and all supplemental affidavits upon which the applicant relies.” The record may reveal that trial counsel did not request a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. KehoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- State v. AlbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. Wallace-LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.