Legal Opinion

Soldini v. Hyams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from tho District Court of the Parish of Natchitoches, Chaplin, J

1Opinion of the CourtDdfffl, J.

The plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendants, as sureties of William Middleton, administrator of the succession of Marie Delphine Derbanne, tho amount due them by said estate, according- to the administrator’s account of his administration.

The District Judge awarded to the plaintiffs 1j>l,950 61, with interest and ■ costs.

The defendants appealed.

The defendants resist the claim on the following grounds :

1st. That the Sheriff’s return of nulla bona on the writ of ft. fa. issued against their principal, was made after the return day. _,

2d. That the bond signed by them expresses no amount,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evarts v. StegerOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Succession of Reilly v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API