Legal Opinion
In re of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John P. Lane, J.
Defendant Samuel, Son & Co., Inc. moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) for dismissal of plaintiffs’ amended complaint and cross claims against it. Plaintiffs Susan C. Rindfleisch and Warren Rindfleisch, who married in 1988, allege in their amended complaint that she suffers from mesothelioma as a result of laundering her husband’s work clothes from 1984 through 1990, unaware that they were laden with asbestos dust and fibers.* In 1989, while Warren Rindfleisch was employed in defendant Samuel’s warehouse as a crane operator, his crane came in contact with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Georgia Pacific, LLC v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Bobo v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
- Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016