Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 27, 1946No. 11145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, hereinafter referred to as the Government, instituted this suit seeking, [1] recovery from appellant Livermore Winery hereinafter referred to as taxpayer, of distilled spirits taxes 1 on brandy lost in December 1936; and [2] recovery of the same amount from taxpayer and appellant St. Paul Mercury-Indemnity Company, on a fruit distiller’s bond. The bond, executed by taxpayer as principal, and the Indemnity Company as surety, was conditioned to secure, among other things, the payment of all taxes on brandy produced by taxpayer.

On December 26, 1936, taxpayer, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Henderson v. Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Greenbrier Distillery Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stitzel-Weller Distillery, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1949
  2. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Parrott & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API