Legal Opinion

Petit v. Adams

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 24, 1968No. 37475Published

1Dissent · ThornalThornal, Justice

I am satisfied that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in the premises. Hence, I would not issue the foregoing order. The majority of the Court has decided that we do have jurisdiction to issue said order. That having been decided, I do not object to the conclusions of the order.

2ConcurrenceErvin, J.

AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT

3Per curiam 1

Upon consideration of the petition to amend the petition for alternative writ to designate as additional respondents the Canvassing Boards of Alachua, Brevard, Broward, Duval, Hernando, Hillsborough, Lee, Leon, Manatee, Monroe, Orange, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, Sumter and…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2; Dissent · Adams.

4Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Town of DavieSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. City of Dunedin v. BenseSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Brake v. GissendannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API