Legal Opinion

In re Farkouh

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Two questions of testamentary construction are presented on the final accounting of the executor in this matter. Both concern the meaning to be attached to the bequest to “ legal heirs ” contained in the paragraph of testator’s will, probated January 5, 1928, reading as follows:

“ Sixth. If I leave no children or if all children shall die prior to their reaching their majority in that event, I give, devise and bequeathe the principal of the said trust funds to my legal heirs. I want my executors and trustees to understand, however, that the trust fund set aside for the benefit of my…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of DurandNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tillman v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Livingston v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. In re the Estate of KavanaghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of BurlingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of HarnedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  5. In re the Estate of SidmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API