Legal Opinion

Norton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1941No. 28824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

Grady Norton, Hoyt Norton, Arzo Norton, Gartrell Tucker, and Hubert Norton, the defendant in this case, were jointly indicted for chicken stealing. The defendant was. tried separately, and was convicted. His motion for new trial, embracing only the general grounds, was overruled, and he excepted. The evidence tending to connect him with the .offense was wholly circumstantial, and, while raising a strong suspicion of his guilt, was insufficient to authorize the jury to find that he stole the chickens, or was present at the theft, or was aiding or abetting others in the stealing, to the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API