Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shepherd v. Schedler

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 27, 2016No. 2015-CA-1750Published

1DissentGuidry, J.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority opinion with regard to the plaintiffs standing, because I do not find he has an interest that “is sufficiently affected so as to ensure that a justiciable controversy is presented to the court.” In re Melancon, 05-1702, p. 9 (La.7/10/06), 935 So.2d 661, 668. In my view, the entirety of the 1997 amendment to La. Const, art. I, § 10 need not fall as the result of the omission of a second exception to the general prohibition on unpardoned convicted felons running for election contained in La. Const, art. I, § 10(B). As the majority opinion notes, our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MelanconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. Board of Liquidation v. Whitney-Central Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Connick v. ShepherdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API