Legal Opinion

Stalting v. Stalting

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1927No. File No. 5937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

One Julius (Stalting, during and prior to the year 1906, owned and resided upon the S. % of section 13, township 101 north, of range 54, in McCook county, S. D., and did not alienate said land prior to his death, except as hereinafter set out. During the year 1906 Julius Stalting was a widower. Shortly thereafter he removed from South' D'akota, and ultimately to Oregon, where he died intestate in 1922. After his removal from South Dakota, he remarried, and, at the time of his death, left as his heirs his widow, Mary K. Stalting, four sons, Chris, Herman, George, and Albert J., and three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. WattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Trumbauer v. RustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dean v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Grilley v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Johnson v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McGillivray v. WipfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fischer v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hulsether v. SandersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Merkamp v. NilesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API