Rosenman v. Coppard
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; William B. Sheppard, Judge. Action at law by M. Coppard, trustee in bankruptcy of Rachel Kaufman, against Ike Rosenman, individually and as a member of the firm of Ike Rosenman and Saul Rosenman, copartners doing business as the New York Jobbing House. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, District Judge.
Mrs. Rachel Kaufman conducted two mercantile establishments, one in San Antonio and the other at Mission. Ike Rosenman and Saul Rosenman conducted a jobbing house, and, while this bore the name “New York Jobbing House,” it also was *115situated in San Antonio, and not very remote from Mrs. Kaufman’s place of business. The Rosemnans (particularly Ike) were intimate friends of Mrs. Kaufman in a business and social way as well. Mrs. Kaufman was a regular purchaser from their wholesale stock. She paid them many sums, and occasionally, when there was. a stringency in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grant v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Putnam v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Wrenn v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Smith v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
- Allender v. Southeast Tractor & Equipment Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1959
- Chambers v. Continental Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.