Legal Opinion

Balzer v. Caler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1938No. L. A. 15859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

A hearing was granted in this cause in order to consider the constitutionality of the Unfair Practices Act as amended in 1935. (Stats, of 1935, chap. 477, p. 1546; Deering’s Codes, Laws and Constitutional Amendments, 1935 Supp., Act 8781.) Upon further deliberation, for reasons hereafter appearing, • it is our opinion that the constitutionality of the statute is not involved in this proceeding.

This cause is a companion ease to Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau v. National Candy & Tobacco Co., L. A. 15836, this day decided {ante, p. 634 [82 Pac. (2d) 3]). The appeal is by the plaintiff from a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API