Artemi, Ltd. v. Safe-Strap Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
This is the -fourth opinion in this patent infringement suit. Presently before the Court is Defendant Safe-Strap’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its invalidity affirmative defense. The Court holds that the reissued • patent does not “enlarge[e] the scope of the claims of the original patent,” 35 U.S.C. § 251(d). Thus, Safe-Strap’s motion will be denied.
I
The prior opinions.in this case, Artemi Ltd. v. Safe-Strap Co., 947 F.Supp.2d 473 (D.N.J.2013); Artemi Ltd. v. Safe-Strap Co., 2013 WL 6860734, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181273 (D.N.J. Dec. 27, 2013); and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tillotson, Ltd. v. Walbro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Eli Lilly And Company v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/ACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Artemi Ltd. v. Safe-Strap Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013