Legal Opinion

Landers v. Cobb

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1920No. 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for mandamus (original).

1Per curiam

An extraordinary motion for a new trial was predicated on the ground of alleged newly discovered evidence to the effect that the foreman of the jury trying the case which found the movant guilty was an incompetent juror, because of the fact that before his selection as a juror he had made certain declarations which clearly showed that he was not a fair juror, but was biased and prejudiced against the movant; and that after the trial another juror who had tried the case made an affidavit to the effect that the foreman of the jury had stated, in the jury-room while the verdict was being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Rawlins v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loomis v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Randall v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. DuPre v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. McLendon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. White v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API