Legal Opinion

Keim v. Brumbaugh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1905No. Appeal, No. 219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 219, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from order of O. P. Huntingdon Co., May T., 1903, No. 10, allowing exemption in case of Cora A. Keim v. I. Harvey Brumbaugh. Exceptions to appraisement for debtor’s exemption. Before Woods, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the order allowing the exemption.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

This was, in form, an action in trespass founded upon a breach of promise of marriage, and it ivas begun by a capias. The result was a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff for 15,000. 'Upon execution issued on this judgment, the defendant claimed the benefit of the exemption Act of April 9, 1849, P. K. 533, sec. 1. The sheriff appraised and set aside to the defendant 1300 worth of personal property and on exceptions to this appraisement, the court below overruled the same and confirmed the appraisement. The reason, in substance, given by the learned court is that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gring v. LerchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Schubkagel v. DiersteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Gangwere's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  4. Welker v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Kenyon v. GouldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dietrich v. DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Houk v. Mitchell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API