Legal Opinion

Southern International Pictures, Inc. v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1991No. A91A1063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Friedman sued Southern International Pictures, Inc., Neal G. Gale, and Neal G. Gale, Jr., seeking the principal, interest, and attorney fees on two promissory notes executed by Southern and personally endorsed by the Gales.

Shortly after defendants filed their answer,, plaintiff requested admissions that Southern had executed the notes, as well as renewals and extensions, and that the individual defendants had endorsed them. Defendants did not respond, establishing as fact the matters stated. OCGA § 9-11-36 (a) (2) and (b).

Thereafter, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapman v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Dallas Blue Haven Pools, Inc. v. TaslimiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Dallas Blue Haven Pools, Inc. v. TaslimiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  4. Cawthon Motor Co. v. ScheuflerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aniebue v. Jaguar Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Formaro v. SunTrust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Rose v. Household Finance Corp. IICourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Glisson v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Bruce Rose v. Houshold Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API