United States v. Martinez-Torres
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF THE EN BANC COURT
On July 31, 1991, we issued an order directing the appellants to show cause why this court’s orders of August 20, 1990, vacating and remanding for a new trial but staying mandate, see United States v. Martinez-Torres, 912 F.2d 1552, 1556 (1st Cir.1990) (en banc), should not now be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Peretz v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 115 L.Ed.2d 808 (1991). We have carefully considered the appellants’ response to the show-cause order. Notwithstanding the arguments mustered therein, we believe that Peretz controls.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Sigfredo Rivera-Sola, A/K/A FreddyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Martinez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. David Lloyd NickensCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- James Edward Clark v. Robert Poulton, Utah State Corrections Department, David Jorgensen, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, and John Does I Through XCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. DesirCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Henry Castro-Poupart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- James Edward Clark v. Robert Poulton, Utah State Corrections Department, David Jorgensen, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, and John Does I Through XCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.