Legal Opinion

Corn v. City of Sapulpa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1941No. 29747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, from an order which sustained the separate demurrer of the defendant in error, one of the defendants below, to the amended petition of said plaintiff in an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of the negligence of Isaac Bristow, the other defendant below, in the operation of an automobile owned by the latter defendant and used by him in the performance of his duties as an employee of the defendant in error.

The controversy here is over the effect which should be given…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Russell-Lock Super-Service, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Patsy Oil & Gas Co. v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Retail Merchants Ass'n v. PetermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Roring v. Hoggard Ex Rel. HoggardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API