Legal Opinion
Sharp v. Norwood
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the. Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioners, owners of shares in a cooperative building in which respondent resides as a rent-controlled tenant, instituted this summary holdover proceeding to recover possession of the apartment (see, RPAPL 711 [1]; CCA 204). Petitioners claimed that respondent’s chronic tardiness in meeting her monthly rental obligations constituted a "nuisance” warranting eviction pursuant to the New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (see, 9 NYCRR 2204.2 [a] [2] [tenant may be evicted where "(t)he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carol Management Corp. v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- 2246 Holding Corp. v. NolascoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Adam's Tower Ltd. Partnership v. RichterAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Village Center for Care v. Sligo Realty & Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dino Realty Corp. v. KhanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2014
- Semans Family Ltd. Partnership v. KennedyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.