Legal Opinion
Hill v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 24, 2019No. Case Nos. 4:18-cv-00217-CWD; 4:18-cv-00249-CWDPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable Candy W. Dale, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it Union Pacific Railroad Company's motions to dismiss. Idaho residents Kasey Jorgensen and Michael Hill are employed by Union Pacific; each was injured during the course and scope of his employment while working outside the state of Idaho. Each sued Union Pacific in a separate action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et. seq. , which provides remedies in the form of money damages for on-the-job injuries incurred by employees not covered by state workers' compensation *893laws.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Austin James Osborne v. Barry MinkowDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- Austin James Osborne v. Barry MinkowDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Burning Glass International, Inc. v. Burning Glass InstituteDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- Hall v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
- Joe v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.