Legal Opinion · Dissent

Redfield v. Critchley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1937Published

1DissentO’Malley, J.

The court always has had inherent power in the interest of justice to vacate a judgment. (Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325.) Sections 108 and 528 of the Civil Practice Act, therefore, were intended to place a limit upon the time within which a default judgment should be vacated. (Schlimmer v. New York, Ontario & Western R. R. Co., 212 App. Div. 782.)

Here, there are no intervening or other equities, such as were found in Ladd v. Stevenson (supra). The protection of sections 108 and 528 of the Civil Practice Act, therefore, should be afforded the parties obtaining the default judgment and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Gysin v. GysinNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Cowperthwait v. CritchleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Schlimmer v. New York, Ontario & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API