Palomas Land & Cattle Co. v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Arthur D. Baldwin, a citizen of Ohio, was at all pertinent times the sole surviving trustee of an express trust 1 of which Palomas Land & Cattle Company, a California corporation, hereafter called Palomas, and Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles were beneficiaries. On and prior to March 30, 1950, Baldwin, as such trustee, had in his custody and possession $5,488.11 to which Palomas claimed to be entitled and to which Louis A. Scott, John L. Rasberry and James F. Hulse, citizens of Texas, also claimed to be entitled, the claim of Palomas being adverse to that of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Puget Sound Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Warner v. Florida Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Chieftain Royalty Co. v. Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Gail Michelman v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Perkins State Bank, a Florida Banking Corporation v. John Connolly, the Hanover National Bank of Wilkes-BarreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance v. GustafsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.