Ruff v. Lee
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Justice.
The appellant contends that under the rationale of the decisions in Blocker v. Blackburn, 228 Ga. 285 (185 SE2d 56); Hall v. Stone, 229 Ga. 96 (189 SE2d 403), following Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U. S. 67 (92 SC 1983, 32 LE2d 556), a finding that Code Ann. § 67-1506, supra, is unconstitutional is demanded and that it was error for the trial court to deny her motion for summary judgment.
*428The basic question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. If the statute attacked were to be declared unconstitutional, it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Giordano v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Scott v. PaisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Oliver v. SlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Ellis v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Community Builders, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Coffey Enterprises Realty & Development Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Law v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
- Global Industries, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
- Commercial Bank v. ReaddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.