Legal Opinion

White v. Ludwig

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOweh McGivere, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency and plaintiff cross-moves for leave to amend.

*121Briefly summarized, the following are the allegations of the complaint: Plaintiff was, prior to 1955, a stockholder of American-IIawaiian Steamship Company, hereinafter referred to as “ the Company By 1955, the Company had become an investment company within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 80a-l et seq.). Various violations of that statute and of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U. S. Code, tit. 15, § 78a et seq.) are alleged. Specifically, it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Brenner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Bouton v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Millard v. Newmark & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  3. McCollum v. BillingsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Murray v. Empire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Mitchell v. Bache & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API