In Re Walker
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
David and Linda Walker were granted a conditional use permit by the Waterbury Zoning Board of Adjustment to construct an office and light industrial building in the Route 100 district of Waterbury. On appeal by the Walkers’ neighbor, Peter Watts, the Washington Superior Court granted the permit after a de novo hearing. Peter Watts appeals and we affirm.
Appellant argues that since the Waterbury ordinance governing conditional uses fails to comply with 24 V.S.A. § 4407(2), the ordinance is invalid. Specifically, the ordinance contains no requirement that a proposed conditional use shall not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Application of WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re Zoning Permit Application of ClydeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. PapazoniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In re Snyder Group, Inc. PUD Final PlatSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In re Group Five Investments CU PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.