Wells v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
A jury found appellants Wright, Wells, and Kelly guilty of possession of heroin, D.C.Code § 33-541(d) (1985 Supp.) and of drug paraphernalia with intent to use it unlawfully, id. § 33-603 (1985 Supp.). Wright was also convicted of carrying a pistol without a license, id. § 22-3204 (1981), possession of an unregistered firearm, id. § 6-2311(a) (1981), and possession of unregistered ammunition, id. § 6-2361(3) (1981). All appellants object to the jury selection process as contrary to Super. Ct.Crim.R. 24, and challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Wells also objects…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lyons v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.