W.B. ex rel. M.E.R. v. M.G.R.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, Judge.
This appeal arises from an action seeking a determination that W.B. (“Appellant”) not M.G.R. (“Respondent”), is the father of M.E.R. (“Daughter”).1 The circuit court dismissed the petition with prejudice on the ground that the suit was not timely brought under the Uniform Parentage Act, since, it was initiated after the child’s fifth birthday. Appellants contend that the statute, as currently constituted, provides a right of action and, alternatively, that barring this suit violates their constitutional rights. We find that Respondent had a vested right to be free from a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blaske v. Smith & Entzeroth, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Etling v. Westport Heating & Cooling Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Wilson v. CramerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dice v. DarlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Piskorski v. LariceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.