Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Hensley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER H. SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, Stacy Hensley, brought an action against the appellant, the railway company, for personal injuries inflicted upon him by it while he was engaged for hire in its business of a common carrier in interstate commerce. At the close of his evidence in chief at the trial of the case, he had failed to introduce any proof that at the time of his injury he or the railway company were engaged in interstate commerce. Thereupon the railway company gave notice of its intention to remove the ease for trial to the federal eourt below, filed with the state court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCabe v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Mestre v. Russell & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Yarbrough v. BlakeDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
- City of Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Poindexter v. Gross & Janes Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.