Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1989No. 8819DC1276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff assigns error to denial of his Rule 60(b)(4) motion to be relieved from the “Memorandum of Judgment/Order” and the court’s allowing defendant’s Rule 70 motion ordering plaintiff to “sign the separation agreement. . . .”

Plaintiff argues, among other things, that the provision in the “Memorandum of Judgment/Order” requiring him to “sign the separation agreement” is void for vagueness and that the court had no authority to order him to sign a separation agreement pursuant to the void “Memorandum of Judgment/Order.” We focus our attention therefore on the question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Northwestern Bank v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API