Anderson v. Rimmer

After a careful consideration of the suggestion of error filed in this case, we deem it proper to write and file an amended opinion in lieu of the former, although we reach the same conclusion announced in the former opinion.

The two points presented by this suggestion of error, to which we shall refer, are as follows:

“First. The court is in error-in point of fact, in that the last paragraph of the opinion refers to the district drainage commissioners as the ones whose right to sit is challenged as being interested parties, whereas, in fact, thé members of the county board of drainage…