Legal Opinion

HIKO Energy, Aplt. v. PA PUC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2019No. 39 EAP 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

[J-66-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. HIKO ENERGY, LLC, : No. 39 EAP 2017 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : June 8, 2017 at No. 5 CD 2017 v. : affirming the Order entered on : December 3, 2015 by the : Pennsylvania Public Utility PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : Commission at No. C-2014-2431410. COMMISSION, : : ARGUED: September 26, 2018 Appellee : OPINION JUSTICE MUNDY DECIDED: June 5, 2019 In this appeal by allowance, we consider whether the penalty imposed against…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API