People v. Steven S.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.—
I. Introduction
This appeal challenges the constitutionality of a statute making it a crime to burn a cross on the private property of another for the purpose of terrorizing the owner or occupant or in reckless disregard of that risk. We uphold the statute, concluding it is neither overbroad nor vague, is not an impermissible content-based prohibition on speech, and does not violate equal protection.
II. Facts and Procedure
Steven S. participated in an incident of cross burning involving two sets of neighbors—the Fosters and the Hepburns—in the Humboldt County town of Manila.
Ernes…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. M.S.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- People v. BorrelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. StanistreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.