Legal Opinion
George v. Board of Excise
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 11, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions
■On certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court Avas delivered by
Garrison, J.
The prosecutors seek to set aside the action of the board of excise of the city of Elizabeth in granting a license to one Ernest Richartz, to keep an inn and tavern, on the corner of East Grand and Spring streets, in said city of Elizabeth.
The ground upon Avhich the prosecutors rely is that the license in question was granted contrary to the provisions of the laws of 1905. Pamph. L., p. 42. This act is amendatory of section 2 of the act of 1889, and provides as follows:
“No license to sell spirituous, vinous, malt or brewed liquors, by less…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . MidgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sexton v. BatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State v. CameronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Trinity Resources, Inc. v. Twp. of DelancoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- In re WakefieldDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945
- Wright v. Board of ExciseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.