Household Finance Corp. v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
In 1947, appellant, Household Finance Corporation, obtained a' judgment in Butler County, Ohio, in the amount of $446.11 and costs, against appellee, Opal Ruth Rogers, and her husband, Billy G. Rogers. Based upon that judgment, this action was instituted. From- judgment in' defendant’s favor, this appeal is prosecuted.
The action in Ohio was based upon a promissory noté in the original sum of $475 secured by chattel mortgage, alleged to have been executéd by Billy G. Rogers and Opal Ruth Rogers. The note contained what is known as a warrant of attorney provision in these words:
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- President of the Bank of Alabama v. DaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Boissevain v. BoissevainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Bonfils v. GillespieColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Bonfils v. GillespieColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dant v. Progress Paint Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958