Legal Opinion

Household Finance Corp. v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 20, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

In 1947, appellant, Household Finance Corporation, obtained a' judgment in Butler County, Ohio, in the amount of $446.11 and costs, against appellee, Opal Ruth Rogers, and her husband, Billy G. Rogers. Based upon that judgment, this action was instituted. From- judgment in' defendant’s favor, this appeal is prosecuted.

The action in Ohio was based upon a promissory noté in the original sum of $475 secured by chattel mortgage, alleged to have been executéd by Billy G. Rogers and Opal Ruth Rogers. The note contained what is known as a warrant of attorney provision in these words:

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. President of the Bank of Alabama v. DaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Boissevain v. BoissevainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Bonfils v. GillespieColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Bonfils v. GillespieColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dant v. Progress Paint Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API