Legal Opinion

Joliet Steel Co. v. Shields

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1892Published

Appeal from Circuit Court of Will County; the Hon. Doeeance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Oabtweioht

This case was before this court on a former appeal and was reported, 32 Ill. App. 598. When the case was here at that time, this court was misled by a supposition that the cases of I. C. R. R. Co. v. Simmons, 38 Ill. 242, Mechanicsburg v. Meredith, 54 Ill. 84, Barker v. Koozier, 80 Ill. 205, L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. O’Conner, 115 Ill. 254, and Keegan v. Kinnare, 123 Ill. 280, were similar to this, and in view of the special finding of the jury and of those cases, the declaration was held sufficient after verdict. On appeal to the Supreme Court the declaration was held insufficient after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keegan v. KinnareIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Joliet Steel Co. v. ShieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. SimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Barker v. KoozierIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API