Legal Opinion

Scotto v. Giuliani

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*396OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Tompkins, J.

The appointment of police officers, who are temporarily assigned to perform the duties of a detective for more than 18 months, to the position of a detective, pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 14-103 (b) (2) and the practice of the respondent Safir as Commissioner in adopting and enforcing a policy that allows police officers to execute a waiver of the statute and serve beyond the 18-month period without being appointed as a detective are the issues before this court. They arise in the context of a petition to enjoin the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. MATTER OF SCOTTO v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Scotto v. DinkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scotto v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Lambert v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Scotto v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Scotto v. GiulianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API