In re Ellerhorst
District Court, D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
A debt was-proved in this case by the Bank of British North America against the estate of the-above bankrupts, on a note made by the bankrupts and endorsed by Sheldon, Davis- & Co. At the time the proof was made, no part of the note had been paid by either the makers or endorsers. Subsequently,, however, the endorsers paid to the holder sixty-two per cent, of the amount due, and were released by the holder from the further liability.
It is contended by the assignee that the-holder is entitled to be paid a dividend, not on the whole debt proved by him, but only on the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Swarts v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- In re HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- In re PulsiferDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1880
- Beals v. MayherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Coats Shingle Co. v. Chester Snow Log & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.