Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Tatarow Family Partners, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 2005No. 1D04-5670Published

1Per curiam

Because her notice of appeal was not timely filed, Audrey Randolph’s appeal of a final judgment of foreclosure was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Randolph v. Tatarow Family Partners, Ltd., 881 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). By petition for writ of mandamus, Randolph now seeks an order compelling the circuit court to rule on her motion to proceed as an indigent on appeal, “thereby allowing [her] brief to be entered so that the appeal can proceed.” However, even a favorable ruling on her motion to proceed as an indigent will not result in Randolph’s appeal being reinstated, nor has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. State Ex Rel. GarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Stupelli v. DimitrouleasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Randolph v. Tatarow Family Partners, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API