Cable & Connector Warehouse, Inc. v. Omnimark, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
1 iPLOTKIN, Judge,
concurring with written reasons.
I agree with the majority’s statements of the law on all of the substantive issues pre*1278sented by this appeal; I write separately only to refine the statement of the -law on the procedural issue of summary judgment.
Appellate courts :must review summary judgments de novo. In so doing, appellate courts must ask the same questions as do the courts: whether any genuine issues of material fact exist, and whether the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. La. C.C.P. art. 966(B). In determining whether an issue is “genuine”, courts cannot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayes v. AutinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Oakley v. ThebaultLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Walker v. KroopLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Daniel v. Blaine Kern Artists, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Meunier v. PizzoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997