Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Charleston National Bank

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Kanawha County. Action by Kate P. Hanna against the Charleston National Bank and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and Peter Silman brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DeNt, Judge :

Peter Silman complains of a judgment of the circuit court of Kanawha county rendered in certain proceedings to try the right to certain personal property wherein Kate P. Hanna was plaintiff and The Charleston National Bank, plaintiff in error, Peter Silman, and George Pfeiffer were defendants. The property in controversy was levied on as the property of George Pfeiffer by virtue of an execution for the sum of $165.Of with interest and costs, in favor of the Charleston National Bank, against George Pfeiffer as principal and Peter Silman as surety. By verdict of a jury under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sidensparker v. SidensparkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  3. Welcome v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1843
  4. Clark v. FrenchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1843

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Armstrong v. RossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kegan v. HaslettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Metz v. PattonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Flaherty v. StephensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API