Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1927No. 7604PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

Charles Johnson and Charles Lawrence were indicted, tried, and convicted for a violation of the Act of February 13, 1913, 37 Stat. 670 (U. S. Comp. St. §-8603), to wit, with unlawfully having in their possession 60 bags of sugar, which had been stolen from an interstate shipment, knowing the same to have been stolen. Erom the judgment and sentence of conviction, Lawrence sued out a writ of error.

The first assignment of error is predicated upon certain matters elicited over objection during the cross-examination of the defendant Lawrence, testifying as a witness in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haussener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. State v. GallagherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. August Tom Rizzo v. United States of America, Ruby Nafie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Bostic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API