New Orleans Terminal Co. v. Dixie Rendering, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Judge.
The plaintiff railroad company filed this suit seeking the recovery of an alleged balance due' on a contract whereby it agreed to repair a certain switch track belonging to the defendant.
The facts of the case are, for the most part, undisputed, and the proper determination of the cause hinges upon the interpretation to be given to the word “estimate” as used by the plaintiff in its letter to the defendant of date January 19, 1924.
This is the second time the matter has been presented to us for review. On the first occasion, we were called upon to decide the correctness of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bautovich v. Great Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Lambert v. SanfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- New Orleans Terminal Co. v. Dixie Rendering, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Skagit Mill Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- MIDDLESEX CTY. SEWER. AUTH. v. Bor. of MiddlesexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Denniston and Partridge Company v. MingusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- F. P. Baylot v. HabeebMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- White v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Elkins v. TownsendDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.